Block Cinema (Northwestern University) - Friday, 7pm
John Cassavetes'
final film, LOVE STREAMS, is both his most fully realized in its
portrayal of the fallacy of human connection and his most conventional
in cinematic style. Working in front of the camera for the last time, he
once again cast his wife Gena Rowlands in the female lead—a fitting
public bow for their long collaboration. They play Robert and Sarah, a
dysfunctional brother and sister—he's never learned to love and she
loves too much—who lean on each other as their lives fall apart. LOVE
STREAMS lacks anything that could be called an exposition despite the
heaviest use of non-diegetic music and the only use of dream sequences
in any of Cassavetes' work. We are dropped into the lives of an aging,
drunk, womanizing, and wealthy writer and his clinically depressed,
soon-to-be divorced sister, initially by following them separately on
parallel paths and downward trajectories. Each sibling has a child that
they make a genuine but clumsy attempt to bond with, but ultimately they
prove unfit as parents. Sarah shows up on Robert's doorstep just as
he's taking the 8 year-old son he's never met before on a weekend bender
to Las Vegas. When he returns without his son, Cassavetes and Rowlands
are left to act out the end of this tragedy. The story is somewhat
secondary here, though, as the film functions as a recap of Cassavetes'
previous directorial themes. Cassavetes' lonely artist is colored by a splash of personal regret (he had already been diagnosed with the
liver cirrhosis that would kill him five years later). His sister, on
the other hand, echoes the absurdist antics that Cassavetes was known
for as a younger man, going further and further to keep everything
cheery in the face of her own depression. Using one last script from her
husband to show just what an amazing actress she is, Rowlands continually makes
us forget her character's mental instability, only to unleash it again
like a tantrum. For any fan of his films the
use of Cassavetes and Rowlands' home as the primary set is both comforting
and
distressing. In color, we see all the rich, dark wood on the walls and
the
clutter of years filling up each room, scribbling the scent of John’s
physical
decline on every frame. As his life was coming to a close,
Cassavetes seemed willing to yield a little of his standard formal
difficulty in order to be understood more clearly. What he would not
yield, though, was an insistence that Hollywood sold the public a false
bill of goods regarding love and marriage. It is through understanding
the pain of life that Cassavetes depicts on the screen that we gain
greater appreciation for the joys of our own lives off it, not the other
way around. (1984, 141 min, 35mm) JH - cine-file.info
An archive of my reviews on Cine-File.info, a Chicago guide to Independent and Underground Cinema.
Friday, February 10, 2012
Blake Edward's BREAKFAST AT TIFFANY'S (American Revival)
Music Box — Sunday, 2pm
With one of the most well known plots in movie history, it is the more insidious aspects of this romantic favorite that lend it an enduring appeal. In the popular imagination neither Holly Golightly (Audrey Hepburn) nor Paul Varjak (George Peppard) are remembered for how they pay their rent. To face facts, each of them is a kept person, accepting money from dates or steady lovers. Therein lies much of the appeal of these two characters, who eventually fall in love. Neither is perfect but they have big dreams. They use hope to get through today and to forget the past. Emblematic of this existence is the character of Cat, Holly's rice-paper-thin-metaphor of an orange tabby. Content when given a saucer of milk and happy to stay for some fun, this pet demands no commitments and wouldn't notice them anyway. As much a film about the masks we use to face the world as it is about love (which never really comes), it's fitting that Cat ends up being tossed from a cab into the pouring rain. Untethered and free is fun to a point, but only in the movies do the girl and the boy come back for a kiss, and rescue the sloppy and matted Cat from the downpour. (1961, 115 min, unconfirmed format) JH - Cine-File.info
With one of the most well known plots in movie history, it is the more insidious aspects of this romantic favorite that lend it an enduring appeal. In the popular imagination neither Holly Golightly (Audrey Hepburn) nor Paul Varjak (George Peppard) are remembered for how they pay their rent. To face facts, each of them is a kept person, accepting money from dates or steady lovers. Therein lies much of the appeal of these two characters, who eventually fall in love. Neither is perfect but they have big dreams. They use hope to get through today and to forget the past. Emblematic of this existence is the character of Cat, Holly's rice-paper-thin-metaphor of an orange tabby. Content when given a saucer of milk and happy to stay for some fun, this pet demands no commitments and wouldn't notice them anyway. As much a film about the masks we use to face the world as it is about love (which never really comes), it's fitting that Cat ends up being tossed from a cab into the pouring rain. Untethered and free is fun to a point, but only in the movies do the girl and the boy come back for a kiss, and rescue the sloppy and matted Cat from the downpour. (1961, 115 min, unconfirmed format) JH - Cine-File.info
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)